Security awareness comparison

Cisoshare Training vs Hoxhunt for UAE healthcare

Buyer guide

Cisoshare Training and Hoxhunt address two related but distinct parts of workforce security. Hoxhunt is designed to improve how employees recognise and report real attacks through adaptive phishing simulations, short coaching moments and behavioural measurement. Cisoshare Training is designed to help UAE healthcare organizations assign ADHICS-aligned courses, assess knowledge, issue verifiable certificates and retain evidence for management and audit review.

A productive comparison begins with the outcome. If the security team wants a continuous human threat-detection programme embedded in email and collaboration tools, Hoxhunt deserves serious consideration. If the compliance team needs a direct training-and-certification workflow tied to Abu Dhabi healthcare requirements, Cisoshare is the more focused proposition. Neither outcome should be used as a substitute for the other without checking the facility's risk and regulatory obligations.

01The short answer

Cisoshare Training fits a defined compliance requirement: select an ADHICS course, enroll named employees, assess their understanding and produce completion records, expiring certificates and reports. Its per-attendee catalogue supports small or staged cohorts and keeps the buying decision close to the evidence the compliance owner must deliver.

Hoxhunt fits a continuous behaviour-change objective. Its public product information centres on adaptive phishing across email, SMS, voice, collaboration tools and deepfake scenarios, with immediate coaching and reporting habits. This is a broader operational programme and usually calls for security ownership, technical integration and an agreed simulation cadence. A healthcare organization may need either product or a deliberate combination of both.

02Which need comes first?

Begin with the outcome you need.

Cisoshare Training is likely the better fit when

  • The immediate requirement is demonstrable ADHICS training rather than ongoing phishing simulation.
  • Named assessment results, certificates, expiry dates and downloadable audit reports are required deliverables.
  • The organization wants visible AED pricing per attendee and the ability to start with a specific cohort.
  • Learners need low-friction secure links that work for mixed clinical and administrative populations.
  • The programme is owned by compliance, HR or training staff who want a focused workflow.

Hoxhunt is likely the better fit when

  • The primary goal is to reduce risky clicks and build the habit of reporting suspicious messages.
  • The workforce needs adaptive, frequent and gamified training rather than only scheduled courses.
  • Email, SMS, voice, collaboration-channel or deepfake simulations are in scope.
  • Security wants behavioural signals, individual adaptation and a human-risk operating model.
  • A dedicated team can manage integrations, employee communications, simulation governance and follow-up.

03Side-by-side comparison

What the public record establishes.

Hoxhunt and Cisoshare publish different core outcomes. The table describes what the reviewed official pages establish and identifies questions that still require confirmation during procurement.

CriterionCisoshare TrainingHoxhuntSources
Primary purposeADHICS-aligned courses, assessments, certificates and audit evidence for UAE healthcare teams.Adaptive phishing and security-awareness training intended to improve threat recognition and reporting behaviour.[1][3]
ADHICS specificityCourses are explicitly presented for ADHICS and Abu Dhabi healthcare compliance.Hoxhunt publishes compliance-training capabilities, but the reviewed pages do not confirm a current ADHICS control mapping. Request the mapping and sample evidence.[1][4][6]
Training cadenceFormal course assignments suited to onboarding, annual renewal and targeted compliance remediation.Frequent adaptive simulations and microlearning that change with employee skill, role and behaviour.[2][3]
Attack simulationThe public offer focuses on course-based learning and does not present attack simulation as a service component.Simulations span phishing and published multichannel scenarios including SMS, voice, collaboration tools and deepfakes.[1][3]
Assessment and certificatesCourse assessment results lead to verifiable certificates with defined validity and reporting records.Hoxhunt tracks participation and behaviour. Confirm whether its current compliance module produces the specific certificate and renewal evidence your ADHICS reviewer expects.[2][4]
LanguagesEnglish and Arabic experiences support locally focused course delivery.Hoxhunt states that simulations are available in more than 40 languages; confirm Arabic coverage for every selected module and interface.[1][3]
Access and integrationLearners receive secure direct access while organization administrators manage enrollment and evidence.The phishing programme integrates with Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace and adds reporting actions to employee workflows.[2][3]
Commercial modelCurrent catalogue prices are visible per attendee and course in AED.Hoxhunt states that pricing depends on licence count and service level; obtain a proposal for the chosen modules and workforce.[1][3]

Compliance assurance and phishing resilience are different outcomes

An ADHICS training obligation normally needs a repeatable record: the organization identified the relevant population, delivered the required material, assessed understanding and retained evidence. Cisoshare Training turns those steps into one workflow. The value is administrative clarity. A compliance lead can see the relationship between the employee, course, attempt, result, certificate and renewal date without converting simulation statistics into a formal training record.

Hoxhunt is designed around an operational security question: will an employee recognise and report a realistic malicious message? Its adaptive model gives each person simulations at an appropriate level and provides immediate learning after a decision. That can change behaviour in a way a scheduled course cannot measure. During selection, define the control objective in plain language. If it says 'prove completion of required awareness training,' inspect course evidence. If it says 'reduce exposure to social engineering,' inspect simulation realism, reporting behaviour and remediation.

Consider the clinical workforce before selecting a delivery model

Healthcare populations are rarely uniform. Some employees work continuously in email, while clinicians, contractors and support teams may use shared devices, shift-based access or limited corporate mail. Cisoshare's secure direct-link model is intended to reduce learner friction for a defined assignment. It remains important to test identity verification, mobile usability, accessibility, reminders and the process for employees who change departments or leave before completion.

Hoxhunt's phishing model is most powerful when employees actively use supported mail and collaboration environments. Its public pages describe integrations with Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace and simulations across additional channels. A facility should map which populations can participate safely, how simulations will avoid disrupting clinical work, who approves templates and how the organization handles a reported test. One programme may not need to cover every worker in exactly the same way.

Evaluate Arabic in the complete learner and administrator journey

A language count does not establish the quality of a particular course. Hoxhunt publishes broad multilingual availability, while Cisoshare presents Arabic and English experiences within a UAE compliance context. Ask to inspect the exact Arabic content that will be assigned, including navigation, notifications, scenarios, feedback, assessment language and exported evidence. Healthcare and regulatory terms should be understandable to the intended employee population, not merely translated word for word.

For phishing simulation, localization also affects realism and safety. Verify sender names, cultural context, calendars, currency and reporting instructions. For formal ADHICS training, verify that the Arabic explanation preserves the regulatory meaning and that the certificate identifies the course accurately. If the workforce includes more languages, compare the coverage of the chosen modules rather than the vendor's total language headline.

Build the business case around programme ownership

Cisoshare's public per-attendee prices make a course cohort easy to estimate. The internal workload is mainly maintaining attendees, issuing assignments, following up on completion and planning annual renewal. Hoxhunt's price depends on licences and service level, while the operational return depends on regular use. Include technical setup, email integration, stakeholder communications, simulation governance, investigation procedures and the time required to interpret behavioural reports.

A narrow purchase is not automatically less valuable, and a broad platform is not automatically more mature. The right investment is the one the organization can operate consistently. Ask the compliance, security, HR and clinical operations owners to agree on success before requesting proposals. This prevents a facility from buying an advanced simulation engine when it only needs documented training, or buying formal training while expecting it to measure real-world reporting behaviour.

05A shared demonstration script

Questions to take into a vendor demonstration

Ask both vendors to demonstrate the result with a realistic UAE healthcare cohort rather than answering only with a feature statement.

  1. 01

    Which ADHICS requirement does the proposed learning and evidence address?

  2. 02

    Show the complete Arabic and English experience for a clinical employee.

  3. 03

    Show how administrators prove assignment, attendance, assessment and renewal.

  4. 04

    Which phishing, SMS, voice, collaboration and deepfake simulations are included in the proposal?

  5. 05

    How are shift workers and people without daily corporate-email access handled?

  6. 06

    Where is learner and simulation data processed and stored?

  7. 07

    What safeguards govern simulation approval, delivery and incident escalation?

  8. 08

    Which reports and certificates can be exported for an external reviewer?

  9. 09

    How much administrator and technical time is expected during setup and each month?

  10. 010

    What is the complete annual cost for our modules, workforce, languages and renewals?

06Frequently asked questions

Questions worth resolving before you decide.

01Is Cisoshare Training a complete Hoxhunt replacement?

No. Cisoshare focuses on formal ADHICS-aligned training, assessment, certification and audit evidence. Hoxhunt focuses heavily on adaptive phishing simulation, immediate coaching and behavioural measurement. Cisoshare can meet a focused course-and-evidence requirement, but it should not be presented as a replacement for Hoxhunt's published simulation capabilities.

02Can Hoxhunt satisfy an ADHICS training requirement?

Hoxhunt publishes a compliance-training module that can create training packages, track completion and send reminders. The reviewed official pages do not establish the exact current ADHICS mapping, certificate or evidence format. Ask Hoxhunt to demonstrate those specific deliverables against your facility's control and auditor expectations.

03Which platform is better for phishing simulation?

Hoxhunt is the relevant choice between these two when phishing simulation is the primary objective. Its public platform covers adaptive phishing and multichannel scenarios. Cisoshare's published offer is course-based and does not claim phishing simulation. A facility needing both simulation and formal ADHICS evidence can evaluate a combined operating model.

04Which platform is easier to budget for a small cohort?

Cisoshare displays current prices per attendee and course, which supports direct cohort calculation. Hoxhunt prices according to user licences and service level, so buyers need a proposal. Compare the complete annual operating scenario, because the two prices fund different outcomes.

05Do both platforms support Arabic?

Cisoshare provides Arabic and English training experiences. Hoxhunt states that its simulations support more than 40 languages, but the specific Arabic coverage of the selected compliance lessons, simulations and administrator experience should be confirmed during the demonstration.

06Could we use Cisoshare for annual ADHICS training and Hoxhunt for ongoing simulations?

Yes. That division can be sensible if the organization defines one owner for each programme, avoids duplicate content, aligns employee communications and preserves a clear evidence map. The compliance record should show which system proves mandatory learning and which measures continuing behaviour.

07Continue the evaluation

08Sources and methodology

Read the sources. Then test the product.

We reviewed the official public pages listed below on the stated date. Product scope, contracts and regulatory interpretations can change; verify shortlisted capabilities directly with each vendor.

  1. [1]ADHICS Training CoursesCisoshare Training
  2. [2]Cisoshare Training Terms of UseCisoshare Training
  3. [3]Adaptive Phishing TrainingHoxhunt
  4. [4]Hoxhunt User LicensesHoxhunt Support
  5. [5]Hoxhunt Interactive Platform TourHoxhunt
  6. [6]AAMEN and ADHICS V2Department of Health Abu Dhabi

Hoxhunt is a trademark of its respective owner. Cisoshare is not affiliated with or endorsed by Hoxhunt. This is a factual buyer guide based on public materials.